Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in determining the fair market value of a rented property for acquisition proceedings, the rental capitalization method should be preferred over the land-and-building method, and whether the Tribunal's conclusion on valuation could be interfered with in appeal.
Analysis: The property was let out at the time of sale, and the Court held that the rental method is a well-recognised and approved basis for valuing such properties. Support was drawn from legislative recognition under the Wealth-tax Rules and from judicial precedent approving capitalization of rental return for buildings in occupation of tenants. On the facts, the rental basis yielded a value below the apparent consideration, and the Tribunal had not recorded a firm contrary finding of fair market value on the material before it.
Conclusion: The rental capitalization method was the proper basis for valuation in the circumstances, and the appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: For rented property, fair market value may properly be determined on the rental capitalization basis, and such valuation will not be displaced in appeal absent a firm contrary finding showing the property to be worth more than the apparent consideration.