Tribunal allows appeal on disallowance of CENVAT credit write-off claim

The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the disallowance of the claim for writing off CENVAT credit was not justified. The decision was based on previous judgments and the specific circumstances of the case, where the write-off was considered a legitimate business expenditure.

---

---

Issues:
1. Disallowance of CENVAT credit written off by the assessee in the P & L Account.

Analysis:
The appeal was against the Order of the Ld. CIT(A)-V, Hyderabad regarding the disallowance of the CENVAT credit written off by the assessee in the P & L Account. The Assessing Officer did not allow the deduction, stating that the writing off of CENVAT credit does not appear to be in order. The assessee argued that the company incurred losses due to rate differentials between input and output excise duty, leading to unrealistic incomes in the P & L account, and claimed the outstanding CENVAT Credit as a deduction. The Ld. CIT(A) did not agree with this argument, citing that the amount could only be debited to the P & L account as a bad debt or a business expense of the current year. He rejected the claim as not being an expense of the year under consideration.

The Coordinate Bench at Chandigarh and Ahmedabad had previously opined on similar issues. In the case of M/s. Mohan Spinning Mills, it was held that the write-off of CENVAT credit was allowable as a business expenditure under section 37(1) of the Act when the manufacturing activities were closed down. Similarly, in the case of Girdhar Fibres Pvt. Ltd., the write-off was considered part of business expenditure and allowable under the provisions of the Act. The Tribunal noted these decisions and directed the Assessing Officer to allow the claim of the assessee, subject to providing necessary details to establish the availability of CENVAT credit before the write-off.

In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the disallowance of the claim for writing off CENVAT credit was not justified. The decision was based on previous judgments and the specific circumstances of the case, where the write-off was considered a legitimate business expenditure.

---