Tribunal allows deduction claims for arrear payment & leave encashment, directs re-verification.

The Tribunal upheld the Assessee's position on deduction claims for arrear payment and leave encashment liability, directing re-verification of contingent liability in fresh assessment. The CIT's order under section 263 was partially set aside, and the Assessee's appeal was partly allowed.

---

---

Issues:
1. Assessment of deduction for provision and contingencies on account of arrear payment due to employees.
2. Assessment of deduction for leave encashment liability.
3. Treatment of contingent liability in the profit and loss account.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Assessment of Deduction for Provision and Contingencies
The Assessee, a cooperative bank, claimed a deduction of Rs. 25,57,00,000 debited in the profit and loss account for arrear payment due to employees following a wage revision. The AO did not make any addition during the assessment u/s 143(3) of the Act. However, the CIT found the AO's order erroneous, arguing that the liability was unascertained and should have been added to the total income. The CIT directed the AO to re-examine and pass a fresh assessment order. The Assessee contended that the liability was ascertained post-wage revision, citing a bipartite agreement and Supreme Court rulings on parity with commercial banks. The Tribunal held that the AO made proper inquiries, and the deduction claim was valid, supporting the Assessee's position.

Issue 2: Assessment of Deduction for Leave Encashment Liability
The Assessee claimed a sum of Rs. 1,30,00,000 for meeting leave encashment liability, of which a portion was paid before the due date of filing the return. The CIT directed the AO to re-examine this liability under section 43B(f) of the Act. The Assessee agreed to allow the deduction for the paid amount before the due date. The Tribunal upheld the deduction for the paid amount and directed the AO to re-verify the remaining liability in the fresh assessment.

Issue 3: Treatment of Contingent Liability
The CIT highlighted a contingent liability of Rs. 2,55,66,000 included in the profit and loss account, which was not debited. The Assessee argued that as it was never charged to the profit and loss account, no disallowance was required. The Tribunal did not press this ground of appeal, allowing the AO to examine and verify the contingent liability in the fresh assessment. The appeal by the Assessee was partly allowed based on the Tribunal's findings on the deduction claims and the treatment of contingent liability.

In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the Assessee's position on the deduction claims related to arrear payment and leave encashment liability, while directing a re-verification of the contingent liability in the fresh assessment. The CIT's order under section 263 of the Act was partially set aside, and the appeal by the Assessee was partly allowed.

---