Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revision petition survived after final assessment was made and the provisional assessment order had merged in the final assessment order, and whether the assessee was required to pursue refund separately under the statute.
Analysis: Once the assessment year in question was finally assessed, the provisional assessment order ceased to have independent operative significance and the revision based on that provisional order did not require further adjudication. The Court also noted that any amount refundable to the assessee could be claimed by making an application for refund under Section 56 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, with the competent authority required to decide such application in accordance with law within the stipulated time. The observation regarding interest was left to the statute and the applicable notification framework.
Conclusion: The revision petition had become infructuous and was disposed of accordingly, with liberty to seek refund under the statutory procedure.