Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cancellation of the petitioner's registration for alleged non-filing of monthly returns was lawful in the absence of prior notice, personal hearing, and in view of the statutory requirement under section 39(15) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006.
Analysis: The cancellation order was found unsustainable because it operated retrospectively, was passed without prior notice, and proceeded on a factual premise that the petitioner had not filed returns, despite production of e-returns for the relevant period. The statutory safeguard under section 39(15) required an opportunity of personal hearing before cancellation of registration. In the absence of compliance with these procedural protections, the cancellation was held to be illegal.
Conclusion: The cancellation of registration could not be sustained and the petitioner was entitled to restoration of registration.