Unlawful Cancellation of Registration: Court Orders Reinstatement, Emphasizes Procedural Compliance

The High Court found the cancellation of the petitioner's registration without prior notice or personal hearing to be flawed. The Court declared the cancellation illegal, quashed the order, and directed immediate reinstatement of the registration. Emphasizing the need for compliance with procedural requirements, the Court highlighted the necessity of providing a show cause notice and conducting a proper hearing before cancellation. No costs were awarded, and the related Writ Miscellaneous Petitions were closed.

---

---

Issues:
Challenge to cancellation of registration under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 without prior notice or opportunity of personal hearing.

Analysis:
The petitioner, a registered dealer, challenged the cancellation of their registration by the respondent. The respondent's reason for cancellation was the petitioner's alleged failure to file monthly returns from April 2016 onwards. However, the petitioner's counsel presented evidence of e-returns filed until May 2016 and explained difficulties faced in uploading returns due to a new portal. The petitioner had sought assistance from the Commercial Taxes Department but was informed of the cancellation without prior notice.

The High Court found multiple flaws in the cancellation order. Firstly, the retrospective effect of the cancellation was deemed improper. Secondly, the lack of a prior notice to the petitioner was highlighted. Thirdly, factual inaccuracies in the reason provided were noted, as evidence of filed e-returns was produced. Lastly, Section 39(15) of the Act required a personal hearing before cancellation, which was not provided in this case. Consequently, the Court declared the cancellation illegal and set aside the impugned order.

As a result of the judgment, the writ petition was allowed, the cancellation order was quashed, and the petitioner's registration was directed to be reinstated immediately. The Court emphasized that if the respondent believed there were contraventions warranting cancellation, a show cause notice and a proper hearing should be conducted in accordance with the law. No costs were awarded, and the related Writ Miscellaneous Petitions were closed.

---