Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the firm stood dissolved on the death of a partner and, consequently, whether two separate assessments were required for the periods before and after the death.
Analysis: The question turned on the effect of the death of a partner on the continuance of the firm under section 187(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court noted that its earlier decisions had taken the view that a firm stands dissolved on the death of a partner and that, where a fresh partnership deed is executed, a new firm comes into existence, warranting separate assessments for the old and new firms. It also noticed that the Legislature had given recognition to that view by inserting the proviso to section 187(2) with retrospective effect from 1 April 1975 by section 33 of the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1984.
Conclusion: The firm was dissolved on the death of the partner and two separate assessments were required, one for the period prior to death and another for the period after death.