Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether proceedings under Rule 6(5) of the Central Sales Tax Rules (Kerala), 1957 for completing assessment under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 are barred by limitation or must be initiated and completed within a reasonable time, having regard to Rule 6(7)(i).
Analysis: Section 9(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 applies the State sales tax machinery for CST assessments, and Rule 6(5) requires the assessing authority, after the close of the year, to scrutinise the return and complete assessment. Rule 6(7)(i) separately deals with escaped turnover and prescribes a four-year period. The statutory scheme shows that once a return is filed, the assessment under Rule 6(5) cannot be kept open indefinitely. Even where no express period of limitation is provided, the authority must act within a reasonable time, and that period cannot extend beyond the outer limit indicated by Rule 6(7)(i). Amendments relied on by the State were held not to authorise delayed invocation of Rule 6(5) beyond that period.
Conclusion: The assessment proceedings and notices issued under Rule 6(5) beyond the permissible period were held to be unsustainable and liable to be set aside.