Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the surplus arising from the compulsory acquisition of the assessee's land was assessable as business income on the footing that the purchase and eventual acquisition constituted an adventure in the nature of trade.
Analysis: The land transaction was an isolated one and the assessee was not shown to be engaged in the business of purchase and sale of land. The finding recorded by the Tribunal was that no improvement had been effected on the land by the assessee, and the material did not establish any expenditure on levelling or development for resale. Compulsory acquisition by the Government did not indicate active trading conduct. Applying the settled tests for determining an adventure in the nature of trade, and noting that the burden lay on the Department to prove such a character in a single transaction, the facts did not support the inference of trading activity.
Conclusion: The question was answered in the negative and the surplus was not held to arise from an adventure in the nature of trade; the conclusion was in favour of the assessee and against the Department.
Ratio Decidendi: A single purchase and compulsory acquisition of land does not amount to an adventure in the nature of trade unless the Department establishes trading intention or other features of trade from the surrounding circumstances.