Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a tank used for agricultural or horticultural purposes falls within the definition of "land" under Section 2(f) of the Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) Act, 1961.
Analysis: The definition of "land" is an inclusive one and enlarges the ordinary meaning of the term. Section 2(f) not only refers to land used or capable of being used for agriculture or horticulture, but also includes specific categories such as orchards, kharhur, pasturage, forest land, homestead and land perennially submerged under water. The reference in Explanation I to a tank appurtenant to a homestead, and the inclusion in Section 4(f) of "even land perennially submerged under water" as Class VI land, show that the statute contemplates land under water bodies in appropriate cases. The words "even land" indicate level land submerged under water and exclude riverbeds, not tanks used for irrigation or agricultural support. The object of the Act cannot be used to defeat the plain and expanded statutory language.
Conclusion: A tank meant to provide water for agricultural or horticultural purposes is land within the meaning of the Act.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statute employs an inclusive definition that expressly enlarges the ordinary meaning of "land", courts must give effect to the expanded statutory text and treat land supporting or appurtenant to agricultural use, including tanks used for such purposes, as covered by the definition.