Appeal allowed on limitation grounds due to time-barred tax demand issuance, lack of malafide, transparency upheld.

The appeal was allowed solely on the ground of limitation, with the Tribunal holding that the service tax demand was time-barred for the specified period due to the issuance of the show cause notice beyond the prescribed limitation under Section 73. The Tribunal relied on a previous decision involving a Cooperative Society to reach this conclusion, emphasizing the lack of malafide on the appellant's part. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed without addressing the case's merits, ensuring transparency in the decision-making process.

---

---

Issues:
1. Service tax demand under Security Agency service category.
2. Barred by limitation - period involved and issuance of show cause notice.
3. Applicability of Tribunal's decision on limitation aspect.

Analysis:
1. The appellant in the appeal did not contest the service tax demand under the taxable category of Security Agency service. The appellant's representative acknowledged that the case's merits were against them, citing a judgment from the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court. However, the appellant argued that the Service Tax department's proceeding for recovery of service tax was time-barred as the show cause notice was issued beyond the prescribed limitation under Section 73, considering the period from January to June 2004. The appellant relied on the decision of Jaipur Ex-Servicemen Welfare Cooperative Society Ltd. vs. CCE, Jaipur to support their contention. The Revenue's representative reiterated the Commissioner (Appeals)'s findings.

2. The Tribunal considered the limitation aspect based on the case of Jaipur Ex-Servicemen Welfare Cooperative Society Ltd. The Tribunal's order highlighted that during the period in question, there were conflicting judgments regarding the taxability of Cooperative Societies under the Finance Act, 1994. It was noted that the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court's 2010 decision took a different view, leading to confusion. Citing relevant judgments, the Tribunal concluded that no malafide could be attributed to the appellant. The Tribunal held that the extended period of limitation under Section 73 could not be invoked for demanding service tax, ultimately leading to the service tax demand being considered time-barred for the period specified in the show cause notice.

3. The Tribunal found the issue addressed in the case of Jaipur Ex-Servicemen Welfare Cooperative Society Ltd. to be identical to the present matter. Given the analysis and conclusion in the prior decision, the Tribunal adopted the same reasoning to dispose of the present appeal. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed solely on the ground of limitation without delving into the case's merits. The decision was dictated and pronounced in open court for clarity and transparency.

---