TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal allowed, unaccounted sales not entirely added to income.</h1> <h3>Sri Katakam Srinivas Versus The Income Tax Officer Ward-4 (2), Hyderabad</h3> Sri Katakam Srinivas Versus The Income Tax Officer Ward-4 (2), Hyderabad - TMI Issues:1. Treatment of unaccounted sales as income2. Justification of adding entire unaccounted sales to income3. Rejection of claim regarding profit element on unaccounted salesAnalysis:1. The appellant, engaged in the business of readymade dresses, filed a return for A.Y. 2013-14 declaring total income of &8377;16,53,670/- with a turnover of &8377;35,86,367/-. The total income included a net profit of &8377;15,92,029/-, which comprised excess stock and gross profit on unaccounted sales. The Assessing Officer (A.O) added the entire unaccounted sales amount of &8377;14,55,072/- to the declared income, leading to a dispute. The appellant argued that only the profit margin should be taxed, as already offered, citing disclosure during a survey under Sec. 133A of the IT Act.2. The CIT(A) dismissed the appellant's contention due to the inability to provide corresponding purchases to exclude them and upheld the A.O's decision. The appellant's reliance on specific cases was rejected. The appellant's representative argued that since excess stock was also disclosed during the survey, adding the entire unaccounted sales amount was unwarranted. The representative cited case laws supporting the taxation of profit margins rather than entire sales amounts.3. The Dispute Resolution member analyzed the contentions, noting that the appellant had admitted to excess stock and profit on unaccounted sales during the survey and in the return filing. The member found no reason to interfere with the appellant's returned income, especially considering the higher profit margin on unaccounted sales compared to regular sales. Emphasizing that unaccounted sales should be taxed as income only if proven, the member directed the A.O to delete the addition of unaccounted sales to the income. The member concluded that the A.O's action lacked factual and legal support, allowing the appellant's appeal.This detailed analysis of the judgment highlights the issues involved, the arguments presented by the parties, and the reasoning behind the decision, preserving the legal terminology and significant phrases from the original text.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
