Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Tribunal allows bad debt claim, remits Section 14A for interest, directs club expenses reassessment.</h1> <h3>Seven Seas Petroleum (P.) Ltd. Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Co. Circle-VI (2), Chennai</h3> Seven Seas Petroleum (P.) Ltd. Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Co. Circle-VI (2), Chennai - TMI Issues:1. Claim of bad debt amounting to Rs. 20,98,200.2. Disallowance under section 14A for exempted income.3. Disallowance of club expenses.4. Computation of income under section 115JB.Claim of Bad Debt:The appellant claimed a bad debt of Rs. 20,98,200 from a business transaction with another entity. The Assessing Officer disallowed the claim, stating that the appellant continued business with the debtor and even recovered some amount after writing off the debt. The appellant argued that the debt became bad as the debtor refused payment due to non-recovery from their foreign customer. The Tribunal noted that the debt was unpaid, and the debtor's refusal to pay indicated a trading loss. Citing precedent, the Tribunal allowed the claim as a trading loss, disagreeing with the lower authorities' disallowance.Disallowance under Section 14A:The appellant invested own funds for earning exempted income and claimed disallowance under Rule 8D. The Assessing Officer disallowed the claim, including interest on an overdraft. The Tribunal remitted the matter back to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration, specifically on whether interest on the overdraft for business purposes should be considered for disallowance under Rule 8D.Disallowance of Club Expenses:The Assessing Officer disallowed club expenses due to lack of evidence, despite the appellant submitting bills. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider the issue, emphasizing that if the expenses were incurred for business purposes, they should be allowed.Computation under Section 115JB:The Assessing Officer disallowed an excess claim, reducing the taxable profit. The Tribunal upheld this disallowance as the appellant had agreed to it during assessment. Therefore, the disallowance of the excess claim was confirmed.In conclusion, the Tribunal partly allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, overturning the disallowance of the bad debt claim and directing a reassessment of disallowances under section 14A and club expenses.