TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Gujarat HC Upholds Tribunal Decision on Section 40(a)(ia) Expenditure Disallowance</h1> <h3>PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1 Versus BLOOM DEKOR LTD</h3> The Gujarat HC dismissed the Revenue's Tax Appeal against the Tribunal's judgment, which deleted expenditure disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the ... Disallowance of expenditure u/s. 40(a)(ia) - due date for payment into the account of Central Government - Held that:- The Tribunal by the impugned judgment held that tax deducted at source was deposited, however same was belated. The Tribunal also held that the explanation to section 40(a)(ia) added on 1.4.2005 as held by this Court in case of CIT v. Omprakash R. Chaudhary reported in (2015 (2) TMI 150 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT) is to be applied retrospectively. The Gujarat High Court dismissed the Tax Appeal by the Revenue against the Income Tax Appeal Tribunal's judgment. The Tribunal deleted the disallowance of expenditure under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act amounting to Rs. 88,35,163, stating that tax deducted at source was deposited but belated. The Court applied the explanation to section 40(a)(ia) retrospectively.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
