Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Kerala High Court: Interest Income Assessment Cancelled for Govt Company Converting Loans to Equity</h1> <h3>THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus M/s. PLANTATION CORPORATION OF</h3> The High Court of Kerala upheld the Tribunal's decision to cancel the assessment of interest income for a Government of Kerala company that converted loan ... - Issues involved: Assessment of interest income u/s Government orders, conversion of loan amount to equity, cancellation of interest income assessment by Tribunal, dismissal of appeals by department.The High Court of Kerala heard the case regarding the assessment of interest income at the hands of the respondent-assessee, a Government of Kerala company, which had given advances to two other companies under the control of the Kerala Government. The loans were advanced under Government orders, and since no interest was received from the loanee companies, the respondent converted the loan amount to equity based on the Government's instructions. The Board of Directors of the respondent accepted the Government's proposal, allowing the loan to be converted into equity shares. Despite the respondent's request for interest payment during the period the loan amounts were retained, no interest was received or agreed to be paid by the loanee companies. The Tribunal cancelled the assessment of interest income, stating that as the loans were treated as advances for investments in equity, and there was no accrual or receipt of interest, there was no scope for assessment. The High Court agreed with the Tribunal's finding, emphasizing that as long as the department had no evidence of interest accruing to the assessee, there was no basis for assessment. The Court noted that the other questions raised by the department were not considered by the Tribunal, and therefore, those questions did not arise from the Tribunal's orders. Consequently, the Court dismissed all three appeals filed by the department.