1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Delhi HC Upholds Ruling on Taxability of Interest Income from REC Ltd.</h1> The Delhi HC dismissed the Revenue's appeal against the ITAT order on the taxability of interest income earned by the Assessee from REC Ltd. for RGGVY ... Taxability of interest income as dependent upon subsequent use of the interest income - Held that:- The undisputed fact, as noted by the ITAT, is that the said interest income was earned by the Assessee on the deposit of advances received from REC Ltd. for Rajiv Gandhi Gramin Vidyutikaran Yojana (βRGGVYβ). A Memorandum of Understanding (βMOUβ) was signed on 16th August 2004 between REC and the Assessee whereby inter alia it was agreed that interest earned on the deposits would be used as part of the cost of the projects and no other purpose. In the circumstances, the view taken by the CIT (A) and affirmed by the ITAT, does not suffer from legal infirmity so as to give rise to any substantial question of law. The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal by the Revenue against the ITAT order regarding the taxability of interest income of Rs. 19,87,59,407 earned by the Assessee. The interest income was earned on deposits from REC Ltd. for RGGVY, with a MOU stating it should be used for project costs only. The court found no legal infirmity in the decision of the CIT (A) and ITAT, affirming that the interest income's taxability depends on its subsequent use.