1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appeals Dismissed for Repetitive Legal Issues</h1> The High Court of Madras dismissed the appeals as the issues raised were identical to a previous appeal that was not entertained due to no substantial ... Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Exemption claimed u/s 54B - proof of sale of agricultural land at Neelankarai and re-investment in agricultural land at Mahabalipuram - Bonafide belief - Held that:- The issues raised in these appeals are identical to the issues raised in the appeal in THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VERSUS S.S.M. AHMED HUSSAIN [2017 (8) TMI 929 - MADRAS HIGH COURT], which has not been entertained by this Court as no substantial question of law is involved, in the said appeal. For the reasons discussed in the said appeal, the present appeals are also not entertained. The High Court of Madras dismissed the appeals as the issues raised were identical to a previous appeal that was not entertained due to no substantial question of law. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed, and related applications were closed.