TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeals Dismissed for Repetitive Legal Issues</h1> <h3>The Commissioner of Income Tax Chennai Versus Sithi Basheera, Zulaika Banu And K.S.M. Aminath Sharifa</h3> The High Court of Madras dismissed the appeals as the issues raised were identical to a previous appeal that was not entertained due to no substantial ... Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Exemption claimed u/s 54B - proof of sale of agricultural land at Neelankarai and re-investment in agricultural land at Mahabalipuram - Bonafide belief - Held that:- The issues raised in these appeals are identical to the issues raised in the appeal in THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VERSUS S.S.M. AHMED HUSSAIN [2017 (8) TMI 929 - MADRAS HIGH COURT], which has not been entertained by this Court as no substantial question of law is involved, in the said appeal. For the reasons discussed in the said appeal, the present appeals are also not entertained. The High Court of Madras dismissed the appeals as the issues raised were identical to a previous appeal that was not entertained due to no substantial question of law. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed, and related applications were closed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
