Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether imported dialyzers were classifiable under CTH 90189031 and eligible for the benefit of the relevant customs exemption notifications, or liable to be classified under CTH 84212900 with denial of exemption.
Analysis: The imports had consistently been classified under CTH 90189031 and had been allowed the benefit of the exemption notifications. The dispute arose after a departmental circular took the view that purifier dialyzers should be classified under CTH 84212900. The earlier view supporting the assessee's classification had already been accepted in the authorities cited before the Tribunal, and the matter was treated as covered by those decisions. On that basis, the Tribunal held that the duty demand could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The classification adopted by the assessee was accepted and the denial of exemption was rejected; the demand of duty was held unsustainable, in favour of the assessee.