Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the High Court ought to have entertained the writ petition when an alternative statutory appeal lay under the Act, and whether the writ petition should be dismissed with liberty to pursue the appellate remedy.
Analysis: The Court declined to enter into the controversy on the construction of the words "otherwise terminated" in Section 19(1) of the Tamil Nadu Private Colleges (Regulation) Act, 1976. It held that the writ petition filed before the High Court should not have been retained when the statute provided an appeal to the prescribed authority under Section 37. The proper course was to leave the parties to the statutory appellate mechanism, while protecting limitation if the appeal was filed within the time granted by the Court.
Conclusion: The High Court's judgment was set aside and the writ petition was dismissed, with liberty to the respondent to prefer an appeal under Section 37 before the prescribed authority.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded, and the matter was redirected to the statutory appellate forum without any adjudication on the merits of the termination issue.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an effective statutory appeal is available, the writ petition need not be entertained and the aggrieved party should ordinarily be relegated to the prescribed appellate remedy.