Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in computing chargeable profits under rule 1(viii) of the First Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, the assessee was entitled to exclude the gross dividend received from another Indian company, without applying the deductions under sections 57, 80K, 80L and 80M of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: Rule 1(viii) requires exclusion of income by way of dividends from an Indian company from the total income computed under the Income-tax Act. The expression was construed as referring to the category of income and not merely the quantum that survived after deductions under the Income-tax Act. The distinction between gross and net dividend was rejected as controlling the surtax computation. The subsequent amendment introducing section 80AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the later explanation to rule 1 of the First Schedule were noted, but they did not govern the assessment years in question.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to exclusion of the gross dividend amount for surtax computation, unaffected by sections 57, 80K, 80L and 80M of the Income-tax Act, 1961.