Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2014 (5) TMI 1171 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Appeal dismissed: Cash payments, hedging loss, and cash credits upheld. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions to delete the disallowance under Section 40A(3) for cash payments exceeding ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Appeal dismissed: Cash payments, hedging loss, and cash credits upheld.

                          The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions to delete the disallowance under Section 40A(3) for cash payments exceeding the exemption limit, treat hedging loss as non-speculative, and remove unexplained cash credits in the Director's personal account. The Tribunal found the transactions were protected under Rule 6DD, not speculative under Section 43(5), and adequately explained in the accounts. The order was issued on May 5, 2014, in Chennai.




                          Issues Involved:

                          1. Disallowance under Section 40A(3) for cash payments exceeding the exemption limit.
                          2. Treatment of hedging loss as speculative loss.
                          3. Addition of unexplained cash credits in the personal account of the Director.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Disallowance under Section 40A(3) for Cash Payments Exceeding the Exemption Limit:

                          The respondent-assessee, a private company engaged in manufacturing and trading gold jewelry, was scrutinized for transactions involving the purchase of old gold ornaments and the sale of new gold ornaments. The Assessing Officer (AO) concluded that the assessee violated Section 40A(3) by making cash payments exceeding Rs. 20,000 for such transactions. The AO treated the purchase and sale as separate transactions and considered the entire purchase bill amount as paid in cash, leading to a disallowance of Rs. 4,35,31,892.

                          The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)) examined Section 40A(3) and Rule 6DD and found that the transactions were protected by clause (d) of Rule 6DD, as they involved adjustments against liabilities incurred for goods supplied or services rendered. The CIT(A) relied on the judgment in CIT v. Kishan Chand Maheswari Dass and deleted the addition, noting that the transactions were exchange transactions not hit by Section 40A(3).

                          The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, emphasizing that the transactions involved the same person and were settled by paying or receiving the differential amount. The Tribunal confirmed that clause (d) of Rule 6DD applied and that the thrust of Section 40A(3) is on the "payment of cash" for incurring expenditure, which in this case related only to the differential amounts.

                          2. Treatment of Hedging Loss as Speculative Loss:

                          The AO disallowed a hedging loss of Rs. 99,23,199, treating it as a speculative loss under Section 43(5). The CIT(A) examined the issue and noted that certain contracts are not treated as speculative transactions under the proviso to Section 43(5), specifically clause (a), which covers contracts entered into by a person in the course of manufacturing or merchanting business to guard against future price fluctuations.

                          The CIT(A) found that the assessee's futures contract to guard against gold price fluctuations was covered by this exception, as the assessee was in the business of manufacturing and merchandising gold. The Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A)'s decision, confirming that the hedging loss was not speculative and deleting the disallowance.

                          3. Addition of Unexplained Cash Credits:

                          The AO added Rs. 4,19,97,669 as unexplained cash credits reflected in the personal account of the Director. The CIT(A) found that these credits were the result of journal entries passed to adjust the Director's personal account with the business account of the assessee-company. The credits corresponded to various expenses and payments made by the Director on behalf of the company.

                          The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s finding that the credits were self-explaining in the books of accounts, as they were reflected on the debit side of different expenditure accounts. The Tribunal confirmed that there was no basis for treating these credits as unexplained and deleted the addition.

                          Conclusion:

                          The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, finding no merit in the arguments presented. The disallowance under Section 40A(3), the treatment of hedging loss as speculative, and the addition of unexplained cash credits were all correctly addressed and deleted by the CIT(A). The order was pronounced on May 5, 2014, in Chennai.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found