Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1926 (11) TMI 2 - HC - Indian Laws

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Court Determines Property Rights under Oudh Settled Estates Act: Inheritance, Ownership, and Relief The court held that the will of Raja Udai Pratap Sinha Deo Somyaji was initially valid but rendered inoperative by a subsequent declaration under the Oudh ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                          Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                              Court Determines Property Rights under Oudh Settled Estates Act: Inheritance, Ownership, and Relief

                              The court held that the will of Raja Udai Pratap Sinha Deo Somyaji was initially valid but rendered inoperative by a subsequent declaration under the Oudh Settled Estates Act. The plaintiff was entitled to certain properties listed in Lists A and B but not to properties in the settled estate. The court rejected the existence of a family custom of single heir succession and determined the ownership of moveable property and cash held by the Imperial Bank. The plaintiff was granted relief for specific properties while denied others, recognizing the stridhan of Maharani Murar Kumari Devi and determining rightful heirs under the Mitakshara law.




                              Issues Involved:
                              1. Validity and effect of the will of Raja Udai Pratap Sinha Deo Somyaji dated June 17, 1907, in light of the Oudh Settled Estates Act declaration made on May 21, 1908.
                              2. Plaintiff's entitlement to properties listed in Lists A, B, and C by virtue of the will.
                              3. Existence and validity of a family custom of single heir succession.
                              4. Whether houses in Bahraich and Lucknow are accretions to the taluqa and governed by the Oudh Settled Estates Act.
                              5. Ownership of moveable property listed in List D and whether it constitutes accretion to the taluqa.
                              6. Nature of the sums listed in List E and F and whether they are accretions to the taluqa or stridhan.
                              7. Heir to the stridhan of Maharani Murar Kumari Devi.
                              8. Ownership of Government securities and cash held by the Imperial Bank, Benares.
                              9. Relief entitled to the plaintiff.

                              Analysis:

                              Issue 1: Validity and Effect of the Will
                              The court held that the will of Raja Udai Pratap Sinha Deo Somyaji, executed on June 17, 1907, and registered on June 22, 1907, was initially valid. However, the subsequent declaration made by the Raja on May 21, 1908, under the Oudh Settled Estates Act (2 of 1900) rendered the will inoperative concerning the settled estate. The declaration restricted the Raja's power to transfer or bequeath the settled estate beyond his lifetime. The settled estate, therefore, could only be bequeathed as an impartible estate to one person and not to a stranger, which the plaintiff was considered to be under the Mitakshara law.

                              Issue 2: Plaintiff's Entitlement to Properties
                              The court found that the will was valid concerning the properties listed as No. 90 in List A and the entire property in List B, as these were not part of the settled estate. The plaintiff was entitled to these properties by virtue of the will. However, the plaintiff was not entitled to the properties in List A (Nos. 1-89 and 91) and certain houses in List C, as these were part of the settled estate and the will's provisions in this regard were inoperative.

                              Issue 3: Family Custom of Single Heir Succession
                              The court found no evidence supporting the existence of a family custom of single heir succession. Therefore, the claim that the bequest would fail in respect of all properties if it failed for a portion was rejected.

                              Issue 4: Accretion of Houses to the Taluqa
                              The court held that houses situated within the settled estate villages (Items Nos. 2-13 and 20-32 in List C) were accretions to the taluqa and governed by the declaration under the Oudh Settled Estates Act. Consequently, these houses would go along with the taluqa to Defendant No. 1. The Bhinga palace (Item No. 1) was also part of the settled estate.

                              Issue 5: Ownership of Moveable Property (List D)
                              The court concluded that the moveable property listed in List D, which was in the possession of Maharani Murar Kumari Devi, constituted her stridhan and not an accretion to the taluqa. Thus, it would go to her stridhan heirs.

                              Issue 6: Nature of Sums in List E and F
                              The court determined that the sum of Rs. 54,680-3-9 in List E, representing savings by Maharani Murar Kumari Devi, constituted her stridhan and not an accretion to the taluqa. The sum of Rs. 21,320-3-9 collected by Defendant No. 1 after her death was also deemed to be part of the estate and not the plaintiff's entitlement.

                              Issue 7: Heir to Stridhan of Maharani Murar Kumari Devi
                              The court held that the plaintiff was not an heir to the stridhan of Maharani Murar Kumari Devi under the Mitakshara law. The stridhan would go to the rightful heirs as per the order of succession under the Mitakshara.

                              Issue 8: Ownership of Government Securities and Cash (List F)
                              The court concluded that the Government securities and cash held by the Imperial Bank, Benares, constituted the stridhan of Maharani Murar Kumari Devi. Therefore, these would go to her stridhan heirs and not to the plaintiff.

                              Issue 9: Relief Entitlement
                              The plaintiff was entitled to properties listed as No. 90 in List A and the entire property in List B. The claim to other properties, including those in the settled estate and stridhan of Maharani Murar Kumari Devi, was denied.

                              Conclusion:
                              The court's judgment provided a detailed analysis of the issues, affirming the validity of the will concerning certain properties while invalidating it for the settled estate. The court recognized the stridhan of Maharani Murar Kumari Devi and determined the rightful heirs under the Mitakshara law. The plaintiff's claims were partially upheld, granting her entitlement to specific properties while denying others.
                              Full Summary is available for active users!
                              Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                              Topics

                              ActsIncome Tax
                              No Records Found