Prevention of Money Laundering Act: No Retroactive Application

The Karnataka High Court clarified that the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2009 cannot be applied retrospectively to prosecute offenses not listed in the Schedule before a specific date. Relying on constitutional protections against ex-post facto laws, the court quashed Enforcement Directorate proceedings, including the Order of Attachment, as they lacked jurisdiction. The court's decision emphasized the importance of legal certainty and upheld individuals' rights against retrospective prosecution under the Act.

---

---

Issues:
1. Interpretation of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2009 regarding the retrospective application of offences.
2. Validity of Enforcement Case Information Report and Order of Attachment under the Act.

Analysis:
1. The main issue in this judgment revolves around the interpretation of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2009 (PML Act) concerning the retrospective application of offences. The court considered whether the offences allegedly committed by the petitioners before the inclusion of said offences in the Schedule to the PML Act could be prosecuted under the Act. The Division Bench had previously addressed a similar question in another case and opined that offences not included in the Schedule before a certain date could not be tried under the PML Act. The court held that since the offences were added to the Schedule only after a specific date, the Enforcement Directorate could not apply the Act retrospectively to prosecute the petitioners. This decision was based on the protection provided under Article 20(1) of the Constitution of India, which prohibits conviction or penalty under ex-post facto laws.

2. The validity of the Enforcement Case Information Report and Order of Attachment under the PML Act was also challenged in this case. The petitioners argued that since the offences were not part of the Schedule before a certain date, the proceedings initiated against them were without jurisdiction and should be quashed. The respondents tried to distinguish this case from a judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court but the court found the reasoning of the Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court more convincing. Therefore, the court allowed the petitions and quashed the impugned proceedings, including the Order of Attachment, based on the interpretation of the PML Act and the protection provided under the Constitution of India.

In conclusion, the Karnataka High Court, in this judgment, clarified the application of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2009 regarding the retrospective prosecution of offences not included in the Schedule before a specific date. The court emphasized the importance of protecting individuals from being tried under ex-post facto laws and held that the Enforcement Directorate could not apply the Act retrospectively in this case. The court ultimately allowed the petitions and quashed the proceedings, including the Order of Attachment, based on this interpretation and legal reasoning.

---