1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>ITAT rules in favor of assessee, deletes disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of Income Tax Act</h1> The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) partially allowed the appeal for the Assessment Year 2007-08, ruling in favor of the assessee. The disallowance ... - Issues involved: Appeal against order of CIT(A) for AY 2007-08; Disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) of ITA.Issue 1: Order passed without granting opportunity to appellant- Assessee raised grounds challenging order of CIT(A) passed without granting opportunity to explain services rendered by agent.- Assessee did not press this ground during hearing, which was subsequently dismissed.Issue 2: Disallowance made u/s 40(a)(i)- Assessing Officer disallowed payment made to agent for non-deduction of TDS.- Assessee contended payment was for commission agent services outside India, not taxable in India.- AO considered payment for managerial services, falling under 'fee for technical services' u/s 9(1)(vii) of IT Act.- CIT(A) upheld disallowance, stating payment included fees for technical services taxable u/s 195 of IT Act.Arguments before ITAT:- Assessee argued payment was commission for services as per agreement with agent.- Assessee pointed out no disallowance in earlier years, hence sec. 195 not applicable.- Revenue argued services provided by agent were managerial, falling under 'fee for technical services'.- ITAT examined agency agreement clauses and payment details, concluding payment based on sales turnover, not for specific services.- ITAT held payment was commission to agent, not taxable in India, deleted disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia).Conclusion:- ITAT partly allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee.- Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) was deleted.- Order pronounced on 30th Oct 2012.