Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cenvat credit on outward freight for transportation of goods from the factory to customers' premises was admissible when service tax had been paid on the transportation service and the credit was taken belatedly.
Analysis: The transportation service was undisputedly received during the relevant period and service tax had been paid on it. The definition of input service applicable at the material time included clearance of final products from the place of removal. On the facts, the place of removal was the factory gate, and the goods were cleared from there to the buyers' premises. The delay in taking credit was treated as a procedural lapse arising from an accounting entry not being made at the appropriate time, which did not justify denial of the substantive credit benefit.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to cenvat credit on the outward transportation service and the denial of credit was unsustainable.