1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Representation</h1> The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI due to the absence of representation on behalf of the assessee-Appellants, while the ... Maintainability of appeal - Neither anybody appeared on behalf of the assessee-Appellants nor any adjournment application is filed - Held that: - It may be mentioned that as per the maxim VIAILATIBUS ET NON DORMIENTIBUS JURA SUB VENIUNT, law helps those who are vigilant and not those who go to sleep - the appeal is dismissed for default. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed the appeal for default as nobody appeared on behalf of the assessee-Appellants. The Respondent-Revenue was represented by Sh. R.K. Manjhi, DR.