Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 6/2006-C.E. for boiler parts and components supplied to a mega power project, in light of the corresponding customs notification condition and the classification dispute raised by the Revenue.
Analysis: The exemption under the central excise notification depended on the imported goods being exempt from customs duty, and the relevant customs notification covered goods falling under Tariff Heading 9801 required for setting up power projects of 1000 MW or above subject to certification. The Tribunal noted that the same exemption question in the appellant's own case had already been decided in its favour on similar facts, following earlier coordinate decisions on identical goods and notifications. In view of those settled decisions, the impugned denial of exemption could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to the exemption, and the demand and penalty were not sustainable.