Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessable value of damaged goods cleared from a Special Economic Zone to the Domestic Tariff Area could be rejected on the basis of earlier comparable sales and refixed under the Customs Valuation Rules, 1998 despite the auction sale price realised in a distress sale.
Analysis: The goods were damaged by floods and were sold by auction to realise salvage value in association with the insurer. The auction was conducted on a lot basis through tenders, the successful bid was accepted and the insurer approved the procedure and the price realised. The Department did not establish any defect in the sale process or any sufficient basis to discard the realised price. The earlier sales relied on by the Department were not truly comparable because the extent of damage was different. In these circumstances, the auction realisation represented the appropriate cum-value for assessment and there was no justification for revaluation under Rule 6.
Conclusion: The rejection of the declared auction value and the re-determination of assessable value were unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the assessee's auction-based valuation was accepted for customs assessment.
Ratio Decidendi: In a distress sale of damaged goods, where the auction process is bona fide and the realised price is approved and unchallenged on substantive grounds, the transaction value cannot be discarded merely by reference to earlier non-comparable sales.