Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest was leviable under section 11AA of the Central Excise Act, 1944 on duty paid before the extended due date where the packing machines were sealed, treated as uninstalled, and later reinstalled during the month under the Packing Machine (Capacity Determination and Collection of Duty) Rules, 2008.
Analysis: The scheme of Rules 6 to 9 treats the number of operating packing machines with reference to machines installed and actually intended to be operated. Where a manufacturer intimates that a machine will not be operated and the machine is sealed by the departmental officers, it is deemed to have been uninstalled under Rule 6(5). In that situation, if the machines are later unsealed and reinstalled during the month, the third proviso to Rule 9 governs the duty payment, making the differential duty payable by the 5th day of the following month. On the facts, the machines were sealed before 1.7.2013, remained inoperative till 7.7.2013, and were reinstalled on 8.7.2013. Duty was paid on 27.7.2013, which was before the due date under the applicable proviso.
Conclusion: No delayed payment of duty occurred and interest under section 11AA of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was not leviable; the assessee succeeded and the demand was unsustainable.