Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to deduction under section 10AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in respect of its export profits, despite the Revenue's objection that the unit had manufactured medallions rather than pendants and had allegedly not complied with the SEZ approval conditions.
Analysis: Deduction under section 10AA is available to an entrepreneur approved under the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 for profits derived from export of articles or things manufactured or produced in the SEZ. The assessee had approval under section 15(9) of the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 and remained an approved entrepreneur within section 2(j). The dispute turned on the description of the finished product. Since "pendant" and "medallion" were not defined in the taxing or SEZ enactments, their meaning had to be gathered from common parlance and usage. On that basis, the finished article was held to be a form of pendant, and the mere use of the nomenclature "medallion" did not establish breach of the approval. The Tribunal also held that the purity of the gold did not alter the essential character of the article as a pendant or medallion.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to deduction under section 10AA, and the disallowance was unsustainable.