Tribunal allows discharge of duty liability with cenvat credit, rejecting demand for cash payment

The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the appellant could discharge the defaulted duty liability using cenvat credit. It was held that the duty, which was defaulted, had been correctly paid by the appellant using cenvat credit, as permissible. The Tribunal emphasized that the credit accrued during a later period could be used to pay duty from an earlier period, citing a Board Circular and a judgment by the Hon'ble High Court of Madras. Consequently, the Tribunal found no justification for the Revenue to demand cash payment when the appellant had available cenvat credit in their accounts, deeming the impugned order unsustainable.

---

---

Issues:
- Discharge of defaulted duty liability using cenvat credit
- Applicability of Rule 3(4) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004
- Validity of using cenvat credit for duty payment
- Interpretation of Circular dated 15.12.2003
- Right to use cenvat credit during defaulted period

Analysis:
The case involved an appeal against an order of the Commissioner of Central Excise, Indore, regarding the discharge of central excise duty by a steel tubes manufacturer. The manufacturer had defaulted in paying duty for the period April 2005 to July 2005, leading to a total outstanding amount of &8377; 79,10,841. The manufacturer paid &8377; 28,64,774 through cash deposit and &8377; 50,46,067 through debiting cenvat credit account. The Original Authority confirmed the demand to be paid in cash and imposed a penalty of &8377; 1,00,000.

The appellant contended that they had fully paid the defaulted amount through debit entries in their cenvat credit account, arguing that the provisions invoked by the Revenue were not applicable as they were paying an arrear to the Government. The appellant highlighted that the duty, which was defaulted, had been correctly paid by them using cenvat credit, which was permissible in this case.

The Revenue, however, maintained that the credit accrued during a later period could not be used to discharge duty from an earlier period. After hearing both sides, the Tribunal examined the appeal records to determine whether the appellant could discharge the defaulted duty liability using cenvat credit. The Tribunal referred to a Board Circular clarifying that duty outstandings should be treated as recoverable arrears of revenue.

The Tribunal also cited a judgment by the Hon'ble High Court of Madras in a similar case, where it was observed that the right to pay duty using cenvat credit on accrued amounts cannot be denied unless there are issues of illegality or irregular credit. Based on this, the Tribunal found no justification for the Revenue to insist on cash payment when the appellant had accrued cenvat credit available in their accounts. The Tribunal concluded that the impugned order was not sustainable and allowed the appeal.

---