TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the rebate claim under Rule 5 of the Export of Service Rules, 2005 read with Notification No. 11/2005-ST could be rejected as time-barred in the absence of any prescribed limitation in the notification.
Analysis: Rule 5 of the Export of Service Rules, 2005 permits rebate subject only to the conditions, limitations and procedure specified in the notification. Notification No. 11/2005-ST did not prescribe any time-limit during the relevant period. On a combined reading of the rule and the notification, the rebate mechanism is a self-contained scheme and does not import the one-year limitation applicable to refunds under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 made applicable to service tax matters through Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994. The reasoning was supported by the view taken in analogous rebate cases under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 and the corresponding notification, which was treated as pari materia.
Conclusion: The rebate claim was not time-barred and its rejection on limitation was unsustainable. The appeal was entitled to succeed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the governing rebate notification under a self-contained rebate scheme does not prescribe any limitation period, the general limitation for refund cannot be imported to defeat the rebate claim.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
