Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the vehicles operated by the assessee satisfied the definition and specifications of a tourist vehicle so as to fall within the taxable category of tour operator service.
Analysis: The appeal concerned the earlier remand direction requiring examination of whether the vehicles answered the definition of tourist vehicle under Section 2(43) of the Motor Vehicles Act read with Rule 128 of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules. The Tribunal noted that in a connected batch of appeals it had already held that coverage under tour operator service depends on the vehicles meeting the specifications of a tourist vehicle under Rule 128. It also recorded that the Commissioner had found, on remand, that the buses did not conform to those specifications.
Conclusion: The vehicles did not satisfy the requirements of Rule 128, so the levy under tour operator service was not displaced and the Revenue's appeal failed.