Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether wireless video capsule endoscopy equipment was eligible for exemption under Item No. 82 of List 37 in Notification No. 21/2002-Customs.
Analysis: The entry covered both fibreoptic flexible oesophago gastroscope and video oesophago gastroscope. The imported equipment functioned as a video-based gastro endoscopy system transmitting images wirelessly from a capsule, and the absence of the word "wireless" in the notification did not exclude it. The technical material showed that the device was a video gastroscope used for visualization of the gastrointestinal tract, bringing it within the description used in the exemption entry.
Conclusion: The equipment was correctly held to fall within Item No. 82 as a "Video Oesophago Gastroscope", and the exemption was admissible.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge to the exemption failed, and the impugned appellate order allowing the benefit of Notification No. 21/2002-Customs was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: An exemption entry referring to a video oesophago gastroscope covers a wireless video capsule endoscopy system when its essential function is video-based visualization of the gastrointestinal tract.