Revenue appeal partly allowed, fresh consideration ordered for certain issues, Assessee cross-objections dismissed.

The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue's appeal, setting aside certain issues for fresh consideration by the CIT(A) and dismissing the Assessee's cross-objections. The order was pronounced on 08-01-2016.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Deletion of disallowance of Directors' remuneration.
2. Deletion of disallowance of various expenses.
3. Deletion of addition of unsecured loans.
4. Deletion of disallowance of loss.
5. Disallowance of PF and ESIC expenses.
6. Disallowance under Section 40A(3) of the Act.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Deletion of Disallowance of Directors' Remuneration:

The A.O. disallowed Rs. 3,00,000/- of Directors' remuneration, considering it excessive compared to the previous year. The CIT(A) deleted this addition, noting that the directors had declared the remuneration in their income and paid taxes accordingly. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, finding no evidence of excessiveness or tax avoidance and dismissing the Revenue's ground.

2. Deletion of Disallowance of Various Expenses:

The A.O. disallowed Rs. 13,73,945/- in miscellaneous store purchases, professional and legal expenses, and telephone expenses, citing abnormal increases without justification. The CIT(A) directed the A.O. to verify and delete the disallowance. The Tribunal found the CIT(A) lacked the power to set aside issues post the 2001 amendment to Section 251 and restored the matter to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision, allowing the Revenue's ground for statistical purposes.

3. Deletion of Addition of Unsecured Loans:

The A.O. added Rs. 5,34,612/- as unproved cash credits due to lack of confirmations. The CIT(A) directed the A.O. to verify and delete the addition. The Tribunal noted the CIT(A)'s lack of power to set aside issues and restored the matter to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision, allowing the Revenue's ground for statistical purposes.

4. Deletion of Disallowance of Loss:

The A.O. disallowed Rs. 18,30,727/- of the claimed loss due to insufficient proof and non-production of books of accounts. The CIT(A) deleted the addition, finding no justification. The Tribunal linked this issue to grounds 2 and 3, setting it aside to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision, allowing the Revenue's ground for statistical purposes.

5. Disallowance of PF and ESIC Expenses:

The A.O. disallowed Rs. 27,282/- for delayed deposit of employees' PF contributions. The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance, referencing Section 36(1)(va) and Section 43B(b). The Tribunal, citing the Gujarat High Court's decision in GSRTC, found no reason to interfere and dismissed the Assessee's ground.

6. Disallowance under Section 40A(3) of the Act:

The A.O. disallowed Rs. 2,39,444/- (20% of Rs. 11,97,224/-) for payments made otherwise than by account payee cheques/drafts. The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance due to lack of contrary evidence from the Assessee. The Tribunal found no reason to interfere, as the Assessee failed to provide new evidence, and dismissed the Assessee's ground.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue's appeal for statistical purposes, setting aside certain issues to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration, and dismissed the Assessee's cross-objections. The order was pronounced in Open Court on 08-01-2016.

---