Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the development agreement amounted to a transfer within the meaning of section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 read with section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, so as to attract capital gains tax.
Analysis: The assessee retained physical possession of the property, the developer was entitled to possession only upon fulfilment of the contractual conditions and last payment, and the balance consideration remained unpaid. The agreement was terminated after the developer failed to comply with the essential terms, and the facts did not establish that the transferee had obtained rights of part performance under section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. On these facts, the arrangement did not mature into a transfer for capital gains purposes under section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Conclusion: No transfer arose under section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 read with section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and the addition towards long term capital gains was not sustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where possession is not handed over in a manner attracting part performance and the transferee has not fulfilled the essential contractual conditions, a development agreement does not constitute a transfer for capital gains purposes under section 2(47)(v).