Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest paid under section 16 of the Bengal Public Demands Recovery Act, 1913, on arrears recovered through certificate proceedings was allowable as a deduction in computing business income, or whether it was to be treated as damages or penalty akin to section 14B of the Employees' Provident Funds and Family Pension Fund Act, 1952.
Analysis: The interest was payable not for any infraction of law but because the certificated demand remained unpaid and the recovery machinery under the Bengal Public Demands Recovery Act, 1913, treated the certificate as enforceable in execution. The interest charged under section 16 was characterised as interest on a judgment debt and as compensation for delay in realisation, not as a penal exaction. Damages under section 14B of the Employees' Provident Funds and Family Pension Fund Act, 1952, stood on a different footing because they were imposed for breach of statutory obligation and were penal in nature.
Conclusion: The interest paid under section 16 of the Bengal Public Demands Recovery Act, 1913, was allowable as a deduction and could not be equated with damages under section 14B of the Employees' Provident Funds and Family Pension Fund Act, 1952.
Ratio Decidendi: Interest paid for delayed discharge of a certificated demand under a recovery statute is compensatory and deductible, unless the exaction is shown to be penal in nature for breach of law.