Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order disallowing sales return turnover could be sustained when the assessing authority did not independently consider the records and documents produced by the dealer and instead acted on the Enforcement Wing report.
Analysis: The writ petition challenged the reassessment and the rejection of the rectification application. The governing principle applied was that an assessing authority, acting in a quasi-judicial capacity, must independently examine the books of accounts and supporting documents produced before it and cannot reject them merely because they were not produced before the Enforcement Wing at the time of audit. The Court relied on the settled position that where relevant records are available, they must be considered on merits after giving due opportunity. On the facts, the respondent had failed to consider the subsequent production of documents and had not exercised independent judgment.
Conclusion: The assessment order was set aside and the matter was remitted to the respondent for fresh consideration after permitting the petitioner to produce the documents and after affording an opportunity of hearing.
Ratio Decidendi: A quasi-judicial assessing authority must independently evaluate the material produced before it and cannot disallow a claim solely because the records were not shown to the Enforcement Wing, especially where the assessee is given an opportunity to place the documents before the authority.