Section 14A disallowance fails without recorded dissatisfaction and exempt income; unverifiable purchases remanded for fresh examination.

Section 14A disallowance under Rule 8D was held unsustainable because the Assessing Officer had not recorded dissatisfaction with the assessee's claim and no exempt income was earned during the year; the deletion was upheld in favour of the assessee. The addition for unverifiable purchases was not finally decided on merits because a similar issue had already been remitted in the assessee's earlier year, so the matter was sent back for fresh examination on the material filed and verified. The Revenue's appeal therefore succeeded only to the limited extent of the remand on purchases.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether disallowance under section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 read with Rule 8D of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 was sustainable in the absence of recorded dissatisfaction by the Assessing Officer and where no exempt income was earned during the year; (ii) Whether the addition made on account of unverifiable purchases deserved deletion or required reconsideration.

Issue (i): Whether disallowance under section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 read with Rule 8D of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 was sustainable in the absence of recorded dissatisfaction by the Assessing Officer and where no exempt income was earned during the year.

Analysis: The prescribed method under Rule 8D could be applied only after the Assessing Officer recorded dissatisfaction with the correctness of the assessee's claim regarding expenditure relatable to exempt income. No such finding was recorded. The record also showed that no exempt income had been earned during the year. On that basis, the disallowance under section 14A was found unsustainable.

Conclusion: The disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D was rightly deleted and the finding was in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether the addition made on account of unverifiable purchases deserved deletion or required reconsideration.

Analysis: The issue had already been set aside in the assessee's own case for the earlier year, and the addition in the present year was made on a similar basis. In view of that earlier decision, the matter required fresh examination on the basis of the material already filed and verified.

Conclusion: The issue was remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh decision and was in favour of the Revenue to that limited extent.

Final Conclusion: The Revenue's appeal succeeded only in part, with the disallowance under section 14A deleted and the issue of unverifiable purchases sent back for fresh adjudication.

Ratio Decidendi: Section 14A disallowance cannot be made under Rule 8D unless the Assessing Officer records dissatisfaction with the assessee's claim, and where no exempt income is earned, the provision has no application on the facts found.

---