TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the assessee was entitled to deduction under section 10B on the basis of the approvals produced; (ii) Whether loss arising from foreign exchange forward contracts was a speculative loss or a business loss; (iii) Whether the matter relating to foreign exchange forward contracts required fresh examination by the Assessing Officer.
Issue (i): Whether the assessee was entitled to deduction under section 10B on the basis of the approvals produced.
Analysis: Deduction under section 10B was available only where the undertaking satisfied the statutory requirement of approval as a hundred per cent export-oriented undertaking by the competent Board under the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951. The approvals relied on by the assessee under the Software Technology Park scheme were not treated as a substitute for the specific approval contemplated by the provision. The revisional authority was therefore justified in holding that the original assessment had allowed the claim without fulfilling the statutory condition.
Conclusion: The claim for deduction under section 10B was rejected and the finding went against the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether loss arising from foreign exchange forward contracts was a speculative loss or a business loss.
Analysis: Foreign exchange forward contracts entered into to hedge export receivables and currency fluctuation risk were treated as incidental to the normal business of the assessee. Currency was treated as distinct from stocks and shares, and hedging transactions undertaken to protect business exposure were not regarded as speculative in the ordinary sense. At the same time, the Tribunal held that the allowable treatment had to be restricted to transactions having proximity with export turnover, and any excess or disconnected portion required separate scrutiny.
Conclusion: The loss on forward contracts was not treated as wholly speculative; the issue was decided in favour of the assessee in principle, subject to the export-turnover nexus restriction.
Issue (iii): Whether the matter relating to foreign exchange forward contracts required fresh examination by the Assessing Officer.
Analysis: The Tribunal found that the proper treatment depended on verification of the extent of the forward contracts vis-a -vis export turnover and also whether any premature cancellation was involved. Since these factual aspects had to be examined afresh, the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for recomputation in accordance with the stated principles.
Conclusion: The issue was remanded for fresh consideration.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only in part. The deduction under section 10B failed, the foreign exchange loss issue was sent back for verification under the hedging and export-turnover principles, and the alternative claim under section 10A survived for consideration in accordance with law.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
