Partnership deed interpretation allows loss-sharing shares to be inferred from the deed and registration form, avoiding technical refusal.

In firm registration under the Income-tax Act, the requirement to specify individual partners' shares was interpreted to include both profit and loss sharing, but not to demand express fractional wording if the deed and registration form together make the arrangement clear. The partnership instrument must be read as a whole to ascertain the partners' intention, and the assessing authority may derive the shares from the documents where the loss-sharing position is reasonably identifiable. On the stated facts, the deed and Form No. 11 sufficiently disclosed that the losses were to be borne equally, so the specification requirement was treated as complied with and refusal of registration was not warranted.

---

---

Issues: Whether the individual shares of partners required to be specified for registration of a firm under the Income-tax Act include shares in both profits and losses, and whether the partnership deed read with the registration application sufficiently disclosed the loss-sharing arrangement so as to entitle the assessee-firm to registration.

Analysis: The expression requiring the individual shares of the partners to be specified in the partnership instrument was construed in the light of the object of firm registration and the settled position that registration should not be refused on mere technicalities. The term "specify" was held to mean mentioning, describing or defining in detail, and not necessarily setting out fractional shares expressly. The instrument has to be read as a whole to ascertain the intention of the partners. Where the deed indicates the arrangement for sharing losses and the application for registration clarifies the proportion, the assessing authority can work out the individual shares. On the facts, clause 7 of the deed provided that the two major partners would bear the total loss, and Form No. 11 clarified that the loss was to be shared 50:50, leaving no ambiguity.

Conclusion: The specification requirement under section 184(1)(ii) covered shares in profits as well as losses, but it was sufficiently complied with here; refusal of registration under section 185 was not justified and the answer was in favour of the assessee.

Ratio Decidendi: For registration of a firm, the individual shares of partners may be gathered from the partnership deed read as a whole and from the registration application, and express fractional specification of loss-sharing is unnecessary if the intended shares can be reasonably ascertained.

---