Packaged commodity valuation: imported monitors remained assessable on MRP basis, defeating differential duty and consequential penalty.

Imported LCD/LED monitors falling within the packaged-commodity regime requiring declaration of retail sale price were assessable to additional customs duty on MRP basis under section 3(2)(b) of the Customs Tariff Act read with section 4A of the Central Excise Act, rather than on transaction value. The nature of the downstream buyer, including supply to brand owners, was held irrelevant where the goods remained packaged commodities. A later amendment to the Legal Metrology Rules expressly covering importers and wholesale dealers did not alter the treatment for the earlier period. The differential duty demand was therefore unsustainable, and the consequential penalty also could not survive.

---

---

Issues: Whether the imported LCD/LED monitors were assessable to additional customs duty on MRP basis under section 3(2)(b) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 read with section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, or on transaction value basis; and whether the penalty imposed could survive if the duty demand failed.

Analysis: The goods were covered by the MRP-based regime from 2008 onwards and were consistently assessed and cleared on that basis. The attempt to deny section 4A treatment only for supplies made to brand owners was rejected because the goods remained packaged commodities and the nature of the downstream sale was held to be irrelevant for application of section 4A. The later amendment to the Legal Metrology Rules, which expressly included importers and wholesale dealers, did not justify treating the earlier period differently against the assessee. The Supreme Court principle relied upon was that once goods fall within the packaged-commodity framework requiring declaration of retail sale price, valuation must follow MRP assessment and not the nature of the ultimate buyer.

Conclusion: The monitors were correctly assessable on MRP basis and the demand for differential duty was unsustainable. The penalty, being consequential, also could not survive.

---