Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2016 (1) TMI 451 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        ITAT directs AO on ALP determination, TP adjustment, and compliance with OECD guidelines. The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, directing the AO to consider the actual management consultancy fees and associated costs, excluding foreign ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          ITAT directs AO on ALP determination, TP adjustment, and compliance with OECD guidelines.

                          The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, directing the AO to consider the actual management consultancy fees and associated costs, excluding foreign exchange losses, for ALP determination. Additionally, the ITAT instructed the AO to exclude the reimbursement of commission from the TP adjustment as per the DRP's directions. The judgment stressed the significance of detailed documentation and compliance with OECD guidelines in transfer pricing cases.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Treatment of Arm's Length Price (ALP) for Management Consultancy Fees.
                          2. Documentation and evidence for Management Consultancy Fees.
                          3. Application for rectification under Section 154 regarding reimbursement of commission.

                          Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Treatment of Arm's Length Price (ALP) for Management Consultancy Fees:
                          The Assessing Officer (AO) and Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) treated the Arm's Length Price (ALP) for management consultancy fees paid by the assessee to its Associated Enterprise (AE) as NIL. The TPO questioned the commercial wisdom behind the expenditure of Rs. 3,19,23,085/-. The TPO's conclusion was based on the benefit test and the inability of the assessee to substantiate the services rendered by the AE. The Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) accepted that services were rendered by the AE, but remanded the matter to the TPO for further examination of detailed budgeting and documentation. The TPO, upon re-examination, upheld the NIL ALP determination. However, the ITAT found that the TPO failed to consider the actual management fees and administrative charges, and directed the AO to consider US$ 4,27,000 plus administration charges of US$ 14,000 with a 5% markup as the ALP.

                          2. Documentation and Evidence for Management Consultancy Fees:
                          The TPO argued that the assessee did not provide detailed documentation to justify the management consultancy fees. The DRP, however, noted that services were indeed rendered, referencing the decision in McCann Erickson India P. Ltd. The ITAT observed that the TPO's analysis included costs unrelated to management consultancy services, such as foreign exchange losses. The ITAT concluded that the actual management fees and associated costs, excluding foreign exchange losses, should be considered for ALP determination. The ITAT emphasized the need for detailed budgeting and documentation, as per the OECD guidelines and the agreement between the assessee and AE.

                          3. Application for Rectification under Section 154 Regarding Reimbursement of Commission:
                          The assessee filed an application under Section 154 for rectification against the TPO's order disallowing Rs. 73,62,023/- as reimbursement of commission, which was not debited to the profit and loss account but routed through the balance sheet. The DRP accepted the assessee's contention that this amount was a capital item and not intra-group services, and thus should not be added to the taxable income. The ITAT directed the AO to exclude this amount from the total TP adjustment, as the DRP had already provided clear directions.

                          Conclusion:
                          The ITAT partly allowed the appeal, directing the AO to consider the actual management consultancy fees and associated costs, excluding foreign exchange losses, for ALP determination. The ITAT also directed the AO to exclude the Rs. 73,62,023/- reimbursement of commission from the TP adjustment, as per the DRP's directions. The judgment emphasized the importance of detailed documentation and adherence to OECD guidelines in transfer pricing matters.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found