Court permits release of goods on depositing 15% value, refundable if no action, transporter liable

The court allowed the release of the petitioner's truck and goods upon depositing 15% of the goods' value as assessed by the authorities, totaling Rs. 1,50,000. The release was contingent on verification of the goods leaving Gujarat and entering Maharashtra. The deposited amount would be refunded if no further proceedings were initiated by the respondents. The court emphasized the transporter's liability in paying the duty amount to protect their reputation, despite being solely responsible for transportation.

---

---

Issues:
Interim relief for goods transportation, liability of transporter, release of goods with tax deposit

Interim Relief for Goods Transportation:
The court considered submissions from both parties regarding the transportation of goods and the liability of the transporter. The petitioner, represented by Mr. Manish Kaji, expressed readiness to pay the duty amount to protect their reputation despite being solely the transporter. The petitioner proposed verifying the goods' movement at the border checkpost to address concerns raised by the respondent authorities. On the other hand, Ms. Maithili Mehta, representing the government, opposed the petition, highlighting that the owner of the goods had not cooperated, raising doubts about potential non-cooperation in future proceedings. After evaluating the arguments, the court decided that the petitioner's truck and goods could be released upon depositing 15% of the goods' value as assessed by the respondents, amounting to Rs. 1,50,000. The release was subject to verification of the goods leaving Gujarat and entering Maharashtra by the authorities. The deposited amount was to be refunded if no further proceedings were initiated by the respondents.

Liability of Transporter:
The case involved a discussion on the liability of the transporter in the transportation of goods. The petitioner, despite being only the transporter, was willing to pay the duty amount to avoid harm to their reputation due to non-delivery of goods. In contrast, the government, through Ms. Maithili Mehta, argued that the petitioner's status as a transporter did not absolve them of responsibility, especially considering the lack of cooperation from the goods' owner. The court acknowledged these arguments but allowed the release of the goods upon payment of the tax deposit, emphasizing that the deposited amount was contingent on any future proceedings initiated by the authorities against the goods' owner under the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act.

Release of Goods with Tax Deposit:
The judgment addressed the issue of releasing goods subject to a tax deposit. The court decided that the petitioner could secure the release of the truck and goods by depositing 15% of the goods' value, amounting to Rs. 1,50,000. This decision was made to serve the interest of justice while ensuring that the goods' movement out of Gujarat was verified by the authorities at the border checkpost. The deposited amount was specified to be refundable if no further actions were taken by the respondents, safeguarding the petitioner's financial interests pending the outcome of any potential proceedings.

---