TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court rules in favor of appellant, overturns Tribunal decision on interest deduction in excise duty assessment.</h1> <h3>M/s. CASTROL INDIA LTD. Versus COMMR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHENNAI</h3> M/s. CASTROL INDIA LTD. Versus COMMR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHENNAI - 2015 (326) E.L.T. 420 (SC) Issues:1. Provisional assessment of excise duty based on interest on receivables.2. Claim for deduction of interest on receivables in final assessment.3. Tribunal's decision disallowing deduction of interest on receivables.4. Appeal against Tribunal's decision and subsequent analysis by the Supreme Court.Issue 1: Provisional assessment of excise duty based on interest on receivablesThe appellant, a manufacturer of lubricating oils, requested provisional assessment for the period April 1996 to December 1996. The Assistant Commissioner ordered provisional assessment under Rule 9B of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, for clearances during that period. The appellant submitted documents supporting interest on receivables at the final assessment stage.Issue 2: Claim for deduction of interest on receivables in final assessmentThe appellant calculated interest on receivables at a specific rate per unit quantity and claimed this benefit in the final assessment. However, the Assistant Commissioner did not accept this claim, leading to a Show Cause Notice and subsequent Order-in-Original upholding the denial of the deduction.Issue 3: Tribunal's decision disallowing deduction of interest on receivablesThe Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant, disallowing the deduction claimed on account of interest on receivables. It concluded that the price charged for credit sales did not include an element of interest, as evidenced by the invoices submitted by the appellant.Issue 4: Appeal against Tribunal's decision and subsequent analysis by the Supreme CourtUpon review, the Supreme Court found the Tribunal's conclusions to be contrary to the record and deemed them as perverse. The Court highlighted that the price difference between credit and cash sales invoices reflected a cash discount of 1.75%. Thus, the Court allowed the appeal, set aside the lower authorities' orders, and quashed the demand. The appellant was also granted the consequential relief of a refund of the differential amount paid to the Revenue.This detailed analysis of the legal judgment showcases the progression of the case from provisional assessment to the final decision by the Supreme Court, emphasizing the critical aspects of interest on receivables and the Court's ultimate ruling in favor of the appellant.
TaxTMI 