Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the demand of Central Excise duty on bought out items cleared along with the manufactured equipment was sustainable, and whether the principle of revenue neutrality supported deletion of the demand.
Analysis: The bought out items such as printers, PC workstations, modems, cable line equipment, ISDN telephones and terminal adapters were found to be accessories providing additional features and convenience, while the manufactured equipment was complete in itself even without them. The adjudicating authority had held that the assessee did not process these items, did not avail MODVAT credit on them during the disputed period, and therefore was not required to pay duty on their clearance. The order also relied on the settled position that a manufacturer may either avail credit and pay duty or forgo credit and not pay duty on such accessories. The Revenue did not dispute the finding on revenue neutrality, and the Tribunal noted that if credit were availed the duty demand would not be sustainable, making the exercise revenue neutral.
Conclusion: The duty demand on the bought out items was not sustainable, and the Revenue appeals were liable to be dismissed.