Director not personally liable for company's tax debts without specific legal provisions

The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a non-working director of a company facing tax recovery measures. The court held that the director cannot be compelled to clear the company's dues unless specific legal provisions are met, emphasizing that directors are not personally liable for company obligations in the absence of such provisions. The judgment directed the tax department to pursue recovery from the company in accordance with the law, dismissing the coercive measures against the director.

---

---

Issues:
1. Whether the petitioner can be compelled to clear the dues of the company as a director.

Analysis:
The judgment pertains to a case where the petitioner, a non-working director of a company engaged in manufacturing roofing sheets, sought relief from coercive recovery measures by the tax department. The company faced allegations of clandestine removal and undervaluation of goods, leading to a demand of Rs. 33.5 lakhs with penalties. Despite appeals and orders for depositing penalties and duties, the company failed to comply, prompting the tax department to pursue recovery from the petitioner as a director.

The court examined the legality of recovering company dues from a director's assets. It referenced a previous case to establish that in the absence of specific provisions, a director is not personally liable for the company's obligations. Citing the precedent, the court highlighted that recovery from directors is permissible only under certain circumstances, such as when the company is in liquidation and specific legal steps are taken. The court emphasized that unless such provisions are invoked, compelling a director to clear company dues is not legally sustainable.

Ultimately, the court held that the tax department's actions compelling the petitioner to settle the company's dues were unjustified. The judgment clarified that while the company remains liable for its obligations, the director cannot be forced to bear the company's financial burdens unless specific legal criteria are met. The court directed the tax authorities to pursue recovery from the company in accordance with the law, thereby disposing of the writ petition in favor of the petitioner.

---