TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Amendment Notification No. 10/2004 Invalidated; Court Rules Show Cause Notice for Pre-Issuance Demands Invalid.</h1> <h3>Union of India & Ors. Versus M/s. Zenith Spinners</h3> The SC dismissed the civil appeal, affirming the HC's decision that Amendment Notification No. 10/2004 was invalid. The notification was deemed to apply ... Validity of Notification No. 10/2004 CE(NT) dated 02.06.2004 - Prospective or retrospective amendment - Amendment relating to export procedure to prevent double benefit - The Amendment Notification No. 10/2004 dated 02.06.2004 has been held to be bad in law by the High Court [2005 (11) TMI 440 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT] - Held that:- Most of the demand in the instant case pertains to the period prior to the issuance of the said notification and so on this ground itself, the show cause notice pertaining to that period would be bad in law - subject matter has become almost tax neutral, it is not necessary to entertain this appeal - Decided against Revenue. The Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeal as the Amendment Notification No. 10/2004 was held to be bad in law by the High Court. The notification would apply prospectively, and most of the demand in the case pertained to a period before its issuance, making the show cause notice invalid. The subject matter was deemed tax neutral, leading to the appeal's dismissal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
