Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search βœ•
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
β•³
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
βœ•
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close βœ•
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

        <h1>Tax Appeals Outcome: Exempt Income Disallowed, Overseas Travel Deductible, Tribunal Upholds CIT (A) Decisions</h1> The Assessee's appeals for A.Y. 2008-09 were partly allowed, and for A.Y. 2009-10 were dismissed. The Revenue's appeals for both years were also ... Disallowance of expenditure by invoking section 14A read with Rule 8D - Held that:- Rule-8D of the Rules was inserted by the I.T (Fifth Amendment) Rules, 2008 with effect from 24.03.2008. Therefore, this rule will be in operation only from assessment year 2009-10. The earlier decisions of the Tribunal on several occasions had decided that 3% of the exempt income shall be treated as the expenditure incurred towards earning such exempt income U/s.14A of the Act. Accordingly, for the assessment year 2008-09 in the case of the assessee, we hereby hold that 3% of the exempt income shall be treated as the expenditure that will be disallowed U/s.14A of the Act.As far as the assessment year 2009-10 is concerned, since Rule 8D comes into effect from that assessment year onwards, we do not find any infirmity in the order of the Ld. CIT (A), who has applied only Rule-14A and reworked the disallowance U/s.14A of the Act and arrived at the disallowance at β‚Ή 12,31,129/- as against β‚Ή 14,95,934/- worked out by the Ld. Assessing Officer. Accordingly, the order of the Ld. CIT (A) is confirmed for the assessment year 2009-10. - Decided partly in favour of assessee. Computing deduction U/s. 10A - not reducing the overseas travel expenses and telecommunication expenses incurred in foreign currency from the total turnover when the same is excluded from the export turnover.( A.Y. 2008-09) - Held that:- This issue is squarely covered by the Special Bench of the Tribunal in ITO Vs. Sak Soft reported [2009 (3) TMI 243 - ITAT MADRAS-D ] wherein it was held that when any such amount is deducted from the export turnover from the numerator, the same shall also be deducted from the total turnover in the denominator while applying the formula (Profit x Export turnover Γ· Total turnover) as provided under the Act. - Decided in favour of assessee. Treating the soft ware expenses as revenue expenditure - Held that:- The software purchased by the assessee are application software used in the back up office operations and thereafter following the decision of CIT Vs. Asahi India Safety Glass Ltd. [2011 (11) TMI 2 - DELHI HIGH COURT ], CIT Vs. Amway India Enterprises Ltd., [2011 (11) TMI 4 - DELHI HIGH COURT] held the issue in favour of the assessee by treating the entire expenses as revenue expenditure. Since no further materials or arguments is brought before us by the Revenue to counter the decision of the Ld.CIT(A) and since the Ld. CIT (A) has only followed the decision of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court and Mumbai Bench of the Tribunal in arriving at his decision, we hereby confirm the order of the Ld. CIT (A). - Decided against revenue Addition made towards donation while computing the book profit U/s. 115JB - CIT(A) deleted the addition - Held that:- Since the assessee company had paid donation, it has to be construed that such donation is paid for meeting out the objects of the company directly or indirectly, though as per Income Tax Act such donation may not be allowable as a deduction. The decision of the Ld. CIT (A) in directing the Ld. Assessing Officer to treat the donation paid as allowable expenditure while computing the book profit of the assessee for the purpose of section 115JB of the Act is correct. Therefore we hereby confirm the order of the Ld. CIT (A) on this issue.- Decided against revenue Issues:- Disallowance of expenditure under section 14A for A.Ys 2008-09 & 2009-10- Computing deduction U/s. 10B of the Act for A.Y. 2008-09- Treatment of software expenses as revenue expenditure for A.Y. 2008-09- Addition made towards donation while computing book profit U/s. 115JB for A.Y. 2008-09- Reducing overseas travel and telecommunication expenses from total turnover for A.Y. 2009-10Disallowance of Expenditure under Section 14A:- The appeals were filed by the Assessee and the Revenue against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (A)-III, Chennai, for A.Ys 2008-09 & 2009-10.- The Assessee challenged the disallowance of expenditure under section 14A read with Rule 8D of the Act. The Tribunal held that Rule 8D was applicable only from the assessment year 2009-10, and for 2008-09, 3% of the exempt income should be treated as the disallowed expenditure.- For A.Y. 2009-10, Rule 8D was applied, and the disallowance was reworked by the CIT (A) to `12,31,129/-. The Tribunal confirmed this decision.Computing Deduction U/s. 10B of the Act:- The issue for A.Y. 2008-09 was whether overseas travel and telecommunication expenses in foreign currency should be reduced from total turnover. The Tribunal relied on a Special Bench decision, stating that such deductions should be made both from export turnover and total turnover.Treatment of Software Expenses:- The Revenue challenged the treatment of software expenses as revenue expenditure for A.Y. 2008-09. The CIT (A) considered the nature of the software purchased and relied on legal precedents to support treating the entire expense as revenue expenditure. The Tribunal upheld this decision.Addition towards Donation for Book Profit:- The Revenue disputed the deletion of the addition made for donation while computing book profit under section 115JB for A.Y. 2008-09. The CIT (A) directed that the donation should be treated as an allowable expenditure, aligning with the Companies Act and relevant legal principles. The Tribunal confirmed this decision.Reducing Overseas Expenses from Total Turnover:- The Revenue raised an issue regarding reducing overseas travel and telecommunication expenses from total turnover for A.Y. 2009-10. The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)'s decision, which was based on a Special Bench ruling.Conclusion:- The appeals of the Assessee for A.Y. 2008-09 were partly allowed, and for A.Y. 2009-10 were dismissed. The Revenue's appeals for both years were dismissed. The Tribunal's order was pronounced on 2nd June 2015 in Chennai.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found