TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Customs House Agent Penalty Overturned for Lack of Evidence</h1> <h3>Falcon India Versus C.C. New Delhi</h3> Falcon India Versus C.C. New Delhi - 2015 (326) E.L.T. 728 (Tri. - Del.) Issues: Penalty imposed on CHA under Regulation 20/22 of CHALR, 2004 for alleged violations.Analysis:1. The appellant, a Customs House Agent (CHA), faced a penalty of Rs. 25,000 under Regulation 20/22 of CHALR, 2004 for mis-declaration of goods in a Bill of Entry filed for an importer, M/s Rishab International. The goods were seized, and investigations revealed the importer was not operational at the provided address. The appellant's CHA license was initially suspended but later reinstated as no discrepancies were found in the documents submitted by the importer.2. Subsequently, the appellant filed Bills of Entry for another importer, M/s Avhyuvaya Impex, Delhi. Although the goods were cleared without mis-declaration allegations, it was later discovered that the documents submitted were fake. The appellant's license was suspended again but reinstated after complying with KYC norms. However, a show cause notice was issued for non-observation of KYC norms under Regulation 13(0) of CHALR, 2004, leading to the imposition of a penalty of Rs. 25,000.3. The Tribunal noted that the license suspension was lifted on both occasions upon confirming compliance with KYC norms. Despite this, the penalty was imposed based on contradictory grounds, claiming lack of due diligence due to fake documents, even though there was no evidence of the CHA's prior knowledge of the importer's illegitimacy. The Tribunal found the penalty unjustified as the appellant had met the KYC requirements, leading to the appeal being allowed, and the impugned order set aside.4. The judgment emphasized the importance of complying with regulatory norms and highlighted the need for clear evidence before imposing penalties on CHAs. The decision underscored the significance of due diligence in customs-related activities and the necessity for fair and justified enforcement actions in cases involving CHAs.
TaxTMI 