TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Uttarakhand High Court Dismisses Appeal on Income Tax Act Section 44BB Interpretation</h1> <h3>Commissioner of Income Tax. Versus EMGS Project Office & M/s Expro Gulf Limited.</h3> The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed the appeal as the amounts in question were found to be covered by Section 44BB of the Income Tax Act, following a ... Entitlement for concessional benefit u/s 44BB - Held that:- Tribunal has found that the amounts in question are covered by Section 44BB of the Income Tax Act, i.e. the amounts represent works like drilling of exploration wells, etc. There is no dispute that there is a judgment of Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Limited vs. Commissioner of Income Tax & another (2015 (7) TMI 91 - SUPREME COURT). In the light of the same, since the amounts received for the works are liable to be reckoned under Section 44BB - Decided against the appellant / revenue. The High Court of Uttarakhand dismissed the appeal as the amounts in question were found to be covered by Section 44BB of the Income Tax Act, following a judgment of the Honorable Apex Court. The Tribunal ruled that the amounts received for works like drilling of exploration wells are liable to be reckoned under Section 44BB. The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
